+66 02 0395676

SCDU STARS RATINGS


What is SCDU Stars Ratings

SCDU Stars Ratings is a grading system for universities of choice to join. Participating universities are awarded five star ratings for their respective categories. The disadvantage is to help prospective students gain an in-depth picture of the university's strengths - all-encompassing the university for sustainable community development.


How are universities stars rated

There are six possible categories in which universities stars ratings can be rated. These cover outcome in the main areas of teaching&learning, research&innovation, academic service, arts&culture, employability and awards as well as excellence in a specialist field.


What is SCDU Stars Ratings provides

Just like the SCD ranking of universities, SCDU Stars can be used to compare universities. And instead of being awarded a ranked position (such as 1st, 2nd, 3rd), the university will be given a five star rating.


Who is SCDU Stars Ratings suitable for

SCDU Stars has a reason to help prospective students gather information to understand which universities are best in community development for them. The fact that each university is given a star rating means that students can quickly identify the strengths of an institution all inclusive. Find the universities that score high in community development that are most important to them. For universities, it is a way to show the strengths in more detail of community development and the university uses this information to improve engagement with the community more effectively.


Star significance

One star universities

Engaging with the community and the private sector has yielded quality outcomes at the community, local, regional and country levels, but at four below-star levels.The one star levels is show sustainable community development on university fair outcomes. Further development of quality outcomes is needed.

Two star universities

Engaging with the community and the private sector has yielded quality outcomes at the community, local, regional and country levels, but at three below-star levels. The two star levels is show sustainable community development on university fair outcomes. Further development of quality outcomes is needed.

Three star universities

Engaging with the community and the private sector has yielded quality outcomes at the community, local, regional and country levels, but at two below-star levels. The three star levels is show sustainable community development on university good outcomes. Further development of quality outcomes is needed.

Four star universities

Engaging with the community and the private sector has yielded high quality outcomes at the community, country and abroad levels, but at one below-star levels. The four star levels is show sustainable community development on university very good outcomes. Further development of quality outcomes is needed.

Five star universities

Engaging with the community and the private sector has yielded higher quality outcomes at the community, country and abroad levels The five star levels is show excellent sustainable community development on university excellent outcomes.


SCDU Stars Ratings Criteria

Because universities have different characteristics. Therefore, the rankings must be varied to fit those universities. The SCD Stars University Ratings for sustainable community development is to make them appropriate for those universities. For six fundamental criteria relate to sustainable community development outcomes.


Teaching&Learning

Typical indicators in teaching&learning quality assessments are producing quality graduates under the curriculum that is consistent with the development of communities either in the two different levels: country and aboard.

Data Required:

(1) list of all the curriculum and co-operation in teaching and learning with the community or the private sector at two different levels: (SCD curriculum)
(2) URL that show the above information (1)
(3) list of all the curriculum in the evaluation year: (All curriculum)
(4) URL that show the above information (3)
Evaluation method: fact: ratio of (SCD curriculum) divided by (All curriculum) multiplying 100


Research

Typical indicators in research quality assessments are research to create knowledge and develop innovations that add value or benefit to the community either in the two different levels: country and abroad.

Data Required:

(1) list of all the research projects or creative works or invention that creates academic value or creates added value to the community, or private sector at the two different levels. (SCD research projects)
(2) URL that show the above information (1)
(3) list of all the research projects in the evaluation year: (All research projects)
(4) URL that show the above information (3)
Evaluation method: fact: ratio of (SCD research projects) divided by (All research projects) multiplying 100


Academic service

Typical indicators in academic service quality assessments are academic service to the community or private sector to be add value or benefit to the community or private sector either in the two different levels: country and abroad.

Data Required:

(1) list of all the academic service projects to the community or private sector to be add value or benefit to the community or private sector either in the two different levels: country and abroad. (SCD academic service projects)
(2) URL that show the above information (1)
(3) list of all the projects in the evaluation year: (All projects)
(4) URL that show the above information (3)
Evaluation method: fact: ratio of (SCD academic projects) divided by (All projects) multiplying 100


Arts&Culture

Typical indicators in arts&culture quality assessments are arts&culture conserve, restore and promote art, culture, traditions and local wisdom as cultural capital that can be utilized for the community either in the two different levels: country and abroad.

Data Required:

(1) list of all the arts&culture projects to the conserve, restore and promote art, culture, traditions and local wisdom as cultural capital that can be utilized for the community either in the two different levels: country and abroad. (SCD arts & culture projects)
(2) URL that show the above information (1)
(3) list of all the projects in the evaluation year: (All projects)
(4) URL that show the above information (3)
Evaluation method: fact: ratio of (SCD arts & culture projects) divided by (All projects) multiplying 100


Employability

Typical indicators in employability quality assessments are employability percentage of undergraduates who have employed or are self-employed in the community or private sector within one year either in the two different levels: country and abroad.

Data Required:

(1) list of all the undergraduates who have been employed or self-employed in the community or private sector within one year at the two different levels. (SCD employed)
(2) URL that show the above information (1)
(3) list of all the undergraduates in the evaluation year: (All undergraduates)
(4) URL that show the above information (3)
Evaluation method: fact: ratio of (SCD employed) divided by (All undergraduates) multiplying 100


Awards

Typical indicators in awards quality assessments are number of awards that students and/or alumni, faculty have been honored received awards in connection with community development work either in the two different levels: country and abroad.

Data Required:

(1) list of all the awards that students and/or alumni, faculty have been honored received awards in connection with the work develop community or private sector at two different levels: country and abroad. (SCD awards)
(2) URL that show the above information (1)
(3) list of all the members (students and/or alumni, faculty) in the evaluation year: (All members)
(4) URL that show the above information (3)
Evaluation method: fact: ratio of (SCD awards) divided by (All members) multiplying 100


Registrations

Register for free site participants and ask a question in the comments below.
scdu stars : ratings@gmail.com


Note:
I. A country counts against a local or regional.
II. The each data within the year of evaluation and participants can choose to apply in any KPI.